[darcs-users] Re: how to redistribute darcs+Eclipse

[Ketil Malde]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

>     Ketil> I would then suggest that emails are sufficient, at least
>     Ketil> from authors of relatively minor contributions

> Unfortunately, current US copyright law means that there are _no_
> minor contributions, unless $30,000--$150,000 statutory damages per
> infringement (which might be construed to mean per version released,
> for example) is minor.

Well - I was sorta hoping that if David (or another maintainer) could
show that we acted in good faith, and remedied the infringement
(i.e. removed offending code) in a timely manner, that would be
sufficient.  "Minor" would then be something that could be easily
replaced or removed.

It seems you're saying that if I create a patch and e-mail it to the
list (but cleverly avoid mentioning any licensing) and the patch gets 
included, I can just wait around and collect? 

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants