[darcs-users] Re: how to redistribute darcs+Eclipse

[Thomas Zander]

On Wednesday 8 June 2005 21:12, Ketil Malde wrote:
> > I agree with the rest of what you said though. A patch is considered a
> > derived work,
>
> Are you sure?
Yes

> Is there legal precedence on this?
Yes. A huge amount even.

> Are you willing to bet the cost of a copyright lawsuit?
Ehm, how is that relevant to the answer of Jamie ?
Don't play the troll here.

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20050608/cd5bea82/attachment.pgp