[darcs-users] record reports back (1/?) for number of changes

Richard A. Smith rsmith at bitworks-inc.com
Thu Sep 15 23:35:14 UTC 2005


Lele Gaifax wrote:

> Hit '?' and you'll get an explanation for 'c': 1.0.4 has become lazier
> on that respect.

Ah.. I see its a feature.  I assume this was done to speed up the record
   process?

-- 
Richard A. Smith
Bitworks, Inc






More information about the darcs-users mailing list