[darcs-users] quadratic _user_ time when recording!

[Tristan Seligmann]

* Isaac Dupree <isaacdupree at charter.net> [2008-01-04 16:31:59 -0500]:

> So it's a little bit of a complicated user-interface design problem, but 
> very important (to me at least - this has happened to me before too, 
> when I do a bunch of hacking and finally end up with change-sets that 
> are somewhat presentable, but I can't usefully record intermediately 
> because I'm still learning exactly what I want to do at that point).  Am 
> I missing something?  Is this a known/documented issue somewhere?

I often record "intermediate" forms of a patch, especially if I start
making semi-unrelated changes, and then make use of amend-record later
to get them into their final form. Since I do not push/pull these
patches anywhere else until they're "complete", there aren't really any
problems with using amend-record.
-- 
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20080105/7b79a477/attachment.pgp