[darcs-users] what about removing the unrevert command?

[Eric Kow]

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 00:10:38 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> This stuff isn't easy, especially when principles conflict with each other.
> :-( and I don't think any of us are designers (and for that matter, do you
> really want to take UI advice from a guy who still uses mutt+vim?)

Sorry, it's late and I forgot to complete my thought. In case anybody
was confused, that last sentence was me saying (again) that even though
I stand on the usability soapbox a lot, I don't actually have a clue
what I'm saying...

But what I was trying to say is that we should try to keep some kind of
principles in mind, keep that Darcs magic alive of great
power/flexibility without the learning curve.  Now maybe removing
unrevert is part of that process... who knows!

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or
xmpp:kowey at jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20110404/ac27cda3/attachment-0001.asc>