[darcs-users] rebase feedback and amend-record flexibility

[Gabriel Kerneis]

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:29:05PM -0600, Michael Hendricks wrote:
> > I'd say that even the existing version of amend-record would be improved by
> > issuing a warning (with a request for confirmation) if I change a patch that
> > is also present in the default-repo.
> >
> > "Warning: This operation modifies a patch the exists in the default remote
> > repo. Are you sure? [yN]"
> >
> 
> I agree.

I see the point, but it means that you wouldn't be able to amend-record without
access to remote repo.  No thanks, there is a reason why I use darcs rather than
svn…

Best,
-- 
Gabriel