[darcs-users] darcs unapply

[Eric Kow]

On 5 Apr 2012, at 16:24, John Lato wrote:
> 
> That discussion has convinced me of
> 
> 1.  "darcs obliterate" should actually, (unrecoverably?) delete stuff.

Yes. The name choice was deliberate.
It used to be called “unpull”, but we switched to obliterate to indicate
destructiveness.

> What if a new command "darcs stash" is added, which is just an alias
> to "darcs obliterate -O_darcs/stash/$timestamp" ?  Or some other
> helpful name, which again is simply an alias to the current
> "obliterate -O" behavior?


Counter-proposal: bring back unpull!
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue557

-- 
Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20120405/157187c9/attachment.asc>