[darcs-users] rebase feedback and amend-record flexibility

[Michael Hendricks]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh at earth.li> wrote:
> BTW, I also don't see why it's particularly useful to not edit B when
> editing A which B implicitly depends on. If A hasn't been sent out, then
> neither has B, so you're not losing much.

True, it's not particularly useful.  There might be performance
implications if B is large or A is deep, but I don't know.

Since people kept saying it wasn't possible, I assumed my mental model
of patch algebra was wrong.  I wanted to correct it but couldn't see
how it was wrong.

--
Michael