[darcs-users] informal poll: do you script interactive darcs?

[Eric Kow]

On 3 Jan 2012, at 14:58, Dave Love wrote:
> See the comment in <http://bugs.darcs.net/msg9586>.  I don't understand
> why it needs an assignment for darcs, but the main reason for writing it
> was the assignment.  It's maintained for the versions I use, but I
> confess I can't keep up with the rate at which Emacs breaks things these
> days, and it really needs some changes in Emacs (or did when I last
> checked).

Note that since Jason's last message, we had a discussion (on darcs-users, presumably) what to do about contribs.  We've since written it down

http://wiki.darcs.net/Development/Policy#contribs

Note also that for the particular change at hand, there may still be the option of only adding this prompt only if writing to the terminal.  It could be worthwhile thinking about how to bring some stability into the picture overall, though.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20120103/70410168/attachment.asc>