[darcs-users] Latin vs. Unicode
Xan
xancorreu at gmail.com
Sun Nov 16 13:53:26 UTC 2014
+1 vote for that.
Please put unicode as native encoding. The rest is past.
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:40:02 +0100
Ben Franksen <ben.franksen at online.de> ha escrit:
> This came up when re-factoring the options system and is of wider interest,
> I think, so I send it to darcs-users.
>
> The issue is, I should say, limited to stuff we get from the command line,
> or from the environment, that is, patch meta-data like author, patch name,
> etc. Here, Darcs has currently built in extra support for handling 8-bit
> encodings like iso latin1. This works by casting the unicode characters in
> the Strings to Word8, which effectively calculates their value modulo 256.
> This is not noticeable as long as you use only languages with characters
> whose code points are below 256, which is the case for most European
> languages; but for Asian ones, not to speak of the other continents, this
> breaks as soon as they enter data in their native languages.
>
> Over the last years, unicode has established itself world-wide and firmly
> and is well supported by all the major operating systems. This is why I vote
> for dropping support for older 8-bit encodings that are not unicode
> compatible, thereby allowing e.g. Chinese users to use Darcs with their
> native languages.
>
> Cheers
> Ben
> --
> "Make it so they have to reboot after every typo." -- Scott Adams
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> darcs-users at darcs.net
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list